<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Transforming Critical Failure to Box Office Success	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://stg.coolerinsights.com/2009/07/transforming-critical-failure-to-box-office-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://stg.coolerinsights.com/2009/07/transforming-critical-failure-to-box-office-success/</link>
	<description>Content Marketing and Social Media Agency in Singapore</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhui		</title>
		<link>https://stg.coolerinsights.com/2009/07/transforming-critical-failure-to-box-office-success/#comment-2383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coolerinsights.com/uncategorized/2009/07/transforming-critical-failure-to-box-office-success/#comment-2383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I agree with Lucian. Regarding your first point: from what I can tell, there were 2 types of &quot;man in the street&quot; reviews. #1: those who liked to see $#!+ blown up, #2: those who are looking for something more substantial. I fall under category #2, but a lot of people I know fall under #1, and they enjoyed the movie.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While your 2nd and 3rd points are valid, I have a feeling that this marketing towards the niche market (and whom I think fall under category #1 because they genuinely care about the (robot) characters) will be more wary about Transformers 3.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree with Lucian. Regarding your first point: from what I can tell, there were 2 types of &#8220;man in the street&#8221; reviews. #1: those who liked to see $#!+ blown up, #2: those who are looking for something more substantial. I fall under category #2, but a lot of people I know fall under #1, and they enjoyed the movie.</p>
<p>While your 2nd and 3rd points are valid, I have a feeling that this marketing towards the niche market (and whom I think fall under category #1 because they genuinely care about the (robot) characters) will be more wary about Transformers 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lucian		</title>
		<link>https://stg.coolerinsights.com/2009/07/transforming-critical-failure-to-box-office-success/#comment-2382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coolerinsights.com/uncategorized/2009/07/transforming-critical-failure-to-box-office-success/#comment-2382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While review ratings have an impact on box office earnings, we must bear in mind that the correlation isn&#039;t as direct and strong as one would infer. While reviewers were looking for strong storyline and compelling characters, the audience, now sufferers of ADD thanks to the speed of tweet, were probably looking to &quot;blow shit up&quot;. Michael Bay scratches that itch better than most, so tadah, box office hit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While review ratings have an impact on box office earnings, we must bear in mind that the correlation isn&#8217;t as direct and strong as one would infer. While reviewers were looking for strong storyline and compelling characters, the audience, now sufferers of ADD thanks to the speed of tweet, were probably looking to &#8220;blow shit up&#8221;. Michael Bay scratches that itch better than most, so tadah, box office hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
